Press "Enter" to skip to content

Crypto CEO Says Competing With Ethereum Is A Bad Idea


In a recent interview with Forbes, Steven Goldfeder, a prominent figure in the blockchain industry and co-founder of Offchain Labs, shared his perspective on the competition surrounding Ethereum. He argued that Competing With Ethereum dominance in the blockchain space would be unwise due to its considerable first-mover advantage and a robust developer community.

Ethereum’s First-Mover Advantage

Goldfeder emphasized that Ethereum’s early entry into the blockchain arena provided it with a significant first-mover advantage. As the first smart contract platform, Ethereum attracted a large user base and established itself as the go-to platform for decentralized applications (DApps). This head start created a network effect that made it challenging for newer projects to gain traction.

The Power of Ethereum’s Developer Community

One of the crucial factors contributing to Ethereum’s success is its expansive and dedicated developer community. With numerous skilled developers actively contributing to the platform’s development, Ethereum continually evolves and improves its features and capabilities. This constant enhancement makes it difficult for competing projects to match Ethereum’s progress and innovations.

Competing Projects and Their Challenges

Despite the growing number of blockchain projects attempting to compete with Ethereum, Goldfeder pointed out that projects like Solana and Cardano, which have made strides in scalability and performance, are still not as mature as Ethereum. These projects lack the same level of developer support, hindering their ability to match Ethereum’s offerings.

Ethereum’s Real Competition

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, echoed Goldfeder’s sentiments in a recent blog post. He emphasized that Ethereum’s true competition lies not in other blockchain projects but in the centralized world. Ethereum’s primary focus is to build decentralized applications, making it unique and purpose-built for this use case.

Differing Perspectives on Competition

While Goldfeder and Buterin view Ethereum’s dominance as almost inevitable, some experts believe that there is room for multiple blockchain platforms to coexist. They argue that different platforms may be better suited for specific applications. For example, Solana’s fast transaction speeds might make it ideal for high-frequency trading, while Ethereum’s strong foundation could be more fitting for decentralized finance applications.

The Future of Ethereum

The future of Ethereum remains uncertain, with varying opinions on its longevity as the leading blockchain platform. However, given its substantial user base, active developer community, and continuous efforts to improve scalability and performance, Ethereum seems poised to remain the dominant platform for decentralized applications for the foreseeable future.


Steven Goldfeder’s remarks on competing with Ethereum highlight the challenges that new blockchain projects face in trying to dethrone the current leader. Ethereum’s first-mover advantage and devoted developer community. They give it a solid foundation, making it a formidable force in the blockchain industry. While some experts believe in the potential for multiple blockchain platforms to coexist. Ethereum’s position as the go-to platform for decentralized applications seems well-established.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *